söndag 15 november 2009

technovember pt II

And now some more technovember-esque music.
Enjoy!

Andrea Parker: Ballbreaker
Orbital: Out there somewhere - part 2
Unai: Oh U and I
Extrawelt: Fernweh
Metamatics: Blue water (edit)
Christoffer Brus: Lovet (Opiate remix)
Autechre: Simmm
Jimpster: Jus' wanna feel
Lindstrom: Arp she said
Plej: The pollination


lördag 14 november 2009

Lika som bär




Christoph Waltz och Lennart Pettersson

Och visst finns det något likt även i åsiktsväg mellan karaktären Hans Landa (i Inglourious Basterds) och "karaktären" Lennart Pettersson (som vill förbjuda niqab)? En ras är helt klart bättre än en annan, är i alla fall gemensam logik. Och idag pratar man om leitkultur i Tyskland igen. Oroande, någon?

fredag 13 november 2009

Brödfest



Till slut blev surdegen surdegsbaguetter. Precis lika bra som köpebröd,
men med skillnaden att jag fick äta de här fem minuter efter att de kom ur ugnen.


My leaven turned into baguettes in the end. Every bit as good as bought ones, with the difference that I ate this bread just five minutes after it came out of the oven.

torsdag 12 november 2009

jonatanb - the lifestyle magazine

Recently I've begun to think about my blog as a sort of lifestyle magazine. But one that kind of turns things on its head. Usually in the glossy magazines you associate with the phrase start with something utterly materialistic and then works its way from there.
For instance, if it's an interior design magazine, it starts off with pictures of million dollar homes in exotic locations. Everything from their is accessories to this lifestyle focus. If it's on the other hand a men's lifestyle magazine, we apparently need help accessorizing just to express what we already are. For what we already are is something we should be content with. We may wish for other, bigger and better things, but may never disclose it.

The third example, which is a lifestyle magazine for women, I would like to expand slightly more on. These tend to start with giving women tools for changing what they're not happy with about themselves, particularely weight, but also what way to dress, accessorize and communicate. They then go on to tell women how to understand men and where the limits are, what is out of bounds and what is acceptable in terms of a good heteronormative boy-girl relationship. This off course starts with the fact that these (for the most part young) girls have not attained a sense of self worth enough to know where the boundaries are, without having to be told. These magazines jump on the wagon before girls have been able to establish this sense, and are doing a swell job promoting feelings of falling short to this endless staircase to perfection. All magazines like Elle and the likes doesn't even have to justify their existance, as the teen mags have been hammering in their message with such success that women tend to have accepted their need of guidance and crave further guidance once out of adolecense, having reached adulthood. Inventing words like pretentious to make people hear the sound of an inner mocking bell that tells them not to dive to deep - after all, we're getting quite far away from the surface, right? All according to my subjective observations and analysis, off course.

If I were to sum this up, one (very crude) suggestion could be: Men's magazines doesn't deal in dreams. Women's magazines doesn't deal in reality. How to get your dream job through your "manly agressive means" is something you're supposed to know when reading these mags, all you need is to finally accessorize to make the statement that you know. Women's magazines on the other hand ignores the fact that reality is hugely tilted in favor of men's (stereotypical) behavior and codes. And the sollution offered is always to succumb to this ('learn to communicate', 'how to be a bossy boss', 'negotiate like a man' and so forth). The norm is to neatly place yourself within these categories and find happyness either by ignoring dreams or ignoring reality.

I've come to gather that my main audience is female (now I'm talking about live performances, it's very hard to gauge what the case is with record buyers). And the people who book me are usually males who are keen to keep this clientell in their clubs. So what does my lifestyle magazine want to suggest to people? Do I want to be an Oprah (or Malou von Siwers) who gives people a triathlon of selfhelp tips, that no one really has the possibility to take them time off from life to realize?

This lifestyle magazine doesn't deal in a primary currency of dreams or reality. It deals in uncovering reality so that we can dream up a reasonably realistic scenario that can go from being a utopia to a nowtopia, without having to lower our visions to only including materialistic goods. This lifestyle magazines doesn't say that you have to like certain music, or certain food or certain theology. They are all tools in trying to uncover deep structures in society that can be said to either create or stand in the way of meaning and peace.
This lifestyle magazine is not a quick fix in that sense. Instead, it's one man's journey through these different experiences, with reports on what tools have been found joyous, useful or troubleing along the way. And there is no way of doing this, without being pretentious. Pretentions to me, are but one of the useful tools I've learnt to harness so far.

Jonatan
Editor in Chief of JonatanB Lifestyle Magazine

onsdag 11 november 2009

Leaven me alone

As far as I can google dictionaries, that's what it is... I'm making my first leaven (surdeg), which is now fit to bake with. The question now is what to do, what to do...

I've got a few different ideas as far as usage goes.


This is one of them, from Pain de Martin, a blog I quite like.

Today I'm not feeling very well, so I'm in bed just taking it very very easy. It's not the type of blogging I usually do, ströbloggande, because the fine line between being personal and being boring is one I usually stay clear of. Instead I go for clearcut boring. To anyone not particularily into theology, cooking and/or music, that is.

Väckelsemöte

En av mina favoriter as far as väckelsemöten goes...

tisdag 10 november 2009

Det postsekulära tillståndet vs Demirbag-Sten

I en debattartikel för ett tag sedan kommenterade Dilsa Demirbag-Sten Sverigedemokraten Jimmie Åkessons debattartikel med att hävda att alla gjorde fel: Både Åkesson och muslimer gjorde misstaget att inte göra skillnad på islam och muslimer. I Demirbag-Stens värld finns det alltså en islam som är helt oberoende av människorna som sällar sig till läran, existerande enkom i idévärlden.
När hon sågar teologen Ola Sigurdsons nya bok Det postsekulära tillståndet finns däremot ingen sådan kristendom som är oberoende av sina utövare. Kristendomen kan inte vara en källa eller idé utan är helt och hållet bara en historisk räcka övertramp och brott mot mänskligheten i religionens namn. Sigurdson vill slå ett slag för att kristendom (och religion) kan ha en plats i den offentliga sfären, bland annat i politiken. Men knappast är det på gamla "meriter" (läs brott mot mänskligheten) som kristendomen bör få ta plats. Att omvärdera vilken plats olika ideologier och idéer bör ha i det offentliga rummet är högst centralt, då vi idag lever i ett Sverige där gårdagens enhetslösningar blir alltmer absurda och illa anpassade till den faktiska befolkningen. Sigurdson är en postmodern och kontextuell teolog, men vilken kontext anspråken görs i och vilken räckvidd sådana anspråk kan tänkas ha är någonting som Demirbag-Sten helt missar att diskutera.

Och någonstans i hennes artikel heter det att Sigurdson slår knut på sig själv. Men där Demirbag-Sten verkligen slår knut på sig själv är när hon lyfter fram hur distinktionen privat-offentligt verkat för kvinnors möjligheter i samhället, alltså just den distinktion som feminister kritiserat mycket hårt ända sedan 68-rörelsen. Många grupper i samhället skulle idag hävda att en sådan distinktion är en illusion. Tänk om någon hade hävdat att HBT-personer ska förpassa sina sexuella preferenser till den privata sfären, men att ens personlighet inte fick höras eller synas i offentligheten. Det skulle helt klart framstå som orimligt. En uppsjö grupper upplever just en sådan problematik, att ens privata inte räcker till för att leva ett fullödigt liv utifrån sina övertygelser eller preferenser. Så hur länge ska oinformerade debattörer som Demirbag-Sten få argumentera för att en sådan distinktion alltjämt har en vettig plats i samhället, bara för att det existerar teokratier eller konservativa påvar? En typ av bevekelsegrund som hon själv vände sig mot så sent som för två veckor sedan.

I Demirbag-Stens värld finns inga bra religiösa utövare. Möjligtvis bara bra religion, men den kan tydligen aldrig utövas. Inte ens i framtiden, även om den gör upp med dagens brister.